Scenarios

A scenario page starts from the situation as the buyer describes it, names the articles and the role that apply, and ends with three things: the sequence of work in the order the protocols run it, the evidence the situation ends with, and the consequence of inaction with its article reference. Every date on a scenario renders from the regulation data 2026-07-27In force. The pages are grouped by the role hub they belong to; each hub on /for/ lists its own.

Scenario pages by role

Scenario pages by role
Scenario	Obligations	Services
Annex I manufacturers
AI Act for medical device manufacturers: adding AI evidence to an existing technical file	Art. 11 Art. 15	Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation Regression testing after substantial modification
AI in machinery: the AI Act and the Machinery Regulation after the Omnibus	Art. 9 Art. 15	Robustness and adversarial testing Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation
EU AI Act and medical devices: the MDR overlap	Art. 9 Art. 11 Art. 17	Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation QMS gap analysis Pre-conformity mock assessment
Generative AI features
Are your Article 50 transparency obligations for AI content in order: evidence for an enforcement query	Art. 50	Article 50 transparency and marking/watermark testing
Our chatbot went live: the European AI Act chatbot checklist under Article 50	Art. 50	Article 50 transparency and marking/watermark testing
Deployers
We bought a high-risk system: our AI Act Article 26 duties	Art. 26 Art. 27 Art. 14	FRIA facilitation and evidence structuring Logging and human-oversight verification
FRIA vs DPIA: which assessment a deployer owes	Art. 27	FRIA facilitation and evidence structuring
What does the EU AI Act require of human oversight: proving it is real, not symbolic	Art. 14 Art. 26	Logging and human-oversight verification
Startups
EU AI Act for startups and SMEs: the cheapest defensible path to evidence	Art. 9 Art. 11 Art. 17	Classification and readiness assessment Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation
Procurement sent an AI vendor due diligence questionnaire: what AI Act evidence answers it	Art. 11 Art. 13 Art. 15	Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation Classification and readiness assessment
Annex III providers
Which AI systems require a conformity assessment, and when a notified body is involved	Art. 17 Art. 11	Pre-conformity mock assessment
When do high-risk AI obligations apply: the runway after the Omnibus	Art. 9 Art. 11 Art. 17	Classification and readiness assessment Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation
Our legal team sent us the AI Act: what do we test	Art. 9 Art. 10 Art. 11 Art. 12 Art. 13 Art. 14 Art. 15 Art. 17	Classification and readiness assessment Robustness and adversarial testing Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation
AI Act investigations: preparing an evidence pack for the first information request	Art. 11 Art. 12 Art. 13	Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation Pre-conformity mock assessment
Our model version changed: what re-testing does the AI Act require	Art. 15 Art. 17	Regression testing after substantial modification
EU AI Act and recruitment: an HR screening tool as an Annex III system	Art. 10 Art. 14 Art. 26	Bias and fairness testing under the Omnibus sensitive-data provision Logging and human-oversight verification
Non-EU providers
Does the EU AI Act apply to US companies	Art. 9 Art. 11 Art. 50 Art. 53	Classification and readiness assessment
Do we need an EU authorised representative under the EU AI Act	Art. 11 Art. 53 Art. 54	Classification and readiness assessment Technical documentation and evidence-pack preparation
EU AI Act vs NIST AI RMF: reusing RMF work as EU evidence	Art. 9 Art. 17	QMS gap analysis Classification and readiness assessment
GPAI providers
Are we a GPAI provider after fine-tuning	Art. 53	GPAI evaluation support
Model evaluation to the AI Act Code of Practice	Art. 53 Art. 55	GPAI evaluation support
When is a GPAI model a model with systemic risk: the compute threshold	Art. 55 Art. 53	GPAI evaluation support Robustness and adversarial testing
Enterprises
EU AI Act AI system inventory: inventory and classify your AI systems	Art. 9 Art. 17 Art. 26	Classification and readiness assessment
Documenting a not-high-risk decision under the Article 6(3) exemption	Art. 9 Art. 11	Classification and readiness assessment
Who needs to comply with the EU AI Act	Art. 9 Art. 26 Art. 50 Art. 53	Classification and readiness assessment

How a scenario is written

Each page rests on the obligation records behind /obligations/, the versioned protocols on /methodology/ and the deliverable specifications on /deliverables/. It names the service that runs the work within the limits at what we cannot do, the guides that give the procedure, and the tools that prefill the obligation set. No scenario describes an engagement or an outcome; it describes what the Act asks for in that situation and what evidence answers it.